December 28, 2004

End of Year Analysis - 2004

END OF YEAR ANALYSIS OF CURRENT SITUATION AND FUTURE PROSPECTS

Please note: (1) the statement below is written for a primarily committed vegetarian audience, so some of the arguments should be softened when dealing with non-vegetarians; (2) the statement is long, and some repeats previous arguments for completeness, but I hope it fits together to make a compelling case for increased and more effective involvement in promoting vegetarianism. I plan to send a much shorter summary statement in the next regular JVNA newsletter.
-----------------------------
We have a very strong case for vegetarianism based on Jewish teachings, and we have truth, morality and justice on our side, but we have made very little progress in getting a consideration of vegetarianism and related issues onto the Jewish agenda. I hope that the thoughts below will help us consider how we can greatly increase the effectiveness of our efforts to move society toward plant-centered diets. For completeness, some of the material is repetitious of points we have been trying to emphasize for a long time.

This document is a work in progress so, as always, comments and suggestions are very welcome.

This statement has the following items:

1. Madness and Sheer Insanity

2. The Moral Madness of the Biblical Prophets

3. The World Threatened as Perhaps Never Before

4. Vegetarianism as a Societal Imperative

5. Vegetarianism as a Spiritual Imperative

6. Getting Vegetarianism Onto the Jewish Agenda

7. Avoiding Criticism of our Views

8. Final Thoughts and Action Ideas

Appendix: Some Jewish Teachings On Involvement and Protest

=========================
1. Madness and Sheer Insanity

In order to properly consider how to be most effective, we should first consider what we are dealing with. We should call the production and consumption of meat today what it is: madness and sheer insanity. While people can be properly nourished and healthier on vegetarian/vegan diets, consider the many negative effects of the production and consumption of animal products.

* The production of animal products is a major contributor to soil depletion and erosion, extensive pesticide use, air and water pollution, the rapid destruction of tropical rain forests and other habitats, rapid species extinction, and potential global warming.

*A meat-based diet requires up to 20 times more land and 10 times more water and energy than a vegetarian diet. Non-vegetarian diets also require vast amounts of pesticides, chemical fertilizer, and other resources.

* Over 70% of the grain grown in the United States and almost 40% of the grain grown worldwide is fed to animals destined for slaughter, while 20 million

people die annually due to hunger and its effects. The US is also a major importer of beef and fish, and these imports are generally from countries where people are starving.

* Over 10 billion farm animals are killed for their flesh annually in the United States. Most have suffered a lifetime of extreme confinement in filthy, overcrowded sheds without sunlight, fresh air or normal activity and stimulation.

As a person with many problems and shortcomings in my life, I generally refrain from advising others on how to live their lives. However, because of their many threats to the planet and so many people, and the horrible ways that animals are raised on "factory farms," I think it has to be said that animal-based diets and agriculture today constitute madness and sheer insanity and that it is essential that there be a shift toward plant-based diets. It is scandalous that the Jewish community (and other communities) are not protesting about the many violations of religious mandates, and that environmentalists are generally not speaking out about the devastating environmental consequences of raising 10 billion farmed animals in the US and 50 billion worldwide.

I could give many more examples of the madness and sheer insanity of modern intensive "livestock" agriculture, but I hope the following eloquent brief excerpt from "Beyond Beef" by Jeremy Rifkin will suffice for now:

"The ever-increasing cattle population is wreaking havoc on the earth's ecosystems, destroying habitats on six continents. Cattle raising is a primary factor in the destruction of the world's remaining tropical rain forests. Millions of acres of ancient forests in Central and South America are being felled and cleared to make room for pastureland to graze cattle. Cattle herding is responsible for much of the spreading desertification in the sub-Sahara of Africa and the western range land of the United States and Australia. The overgrazing of semiarid and arid lands has left parched and barren deserts on four continents. Organic runoff from feedlots is now a major source of organic pollution in our nation's ground water. Cattle are also a major cause of global warming... The devastating environmental, economic, and human toll of maintaining a worldwide cattle complex is little discussed in public policy circles... Yet, cattle production and beef consumption now rank among the gravest threats to the future well being of the earth and its human population."

Return to Top

=========================
2. The Moral Madness of the Biblical Prophets

If current animal-based diets and modern intensive livestock agriculture constitute madness and sheer insanity, how does one respond to this madness. As Robert McAfee Brown, former professor and theologian at Union Theological Seminary in NYC, stated in 1979 at Riverside Church, while referring to the "madness and sheer insanity" of the nuclear arms race, we need what Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel called "moral madness"-- the madness of the biblical prophets.

While there are no biblical prophets today, Jews are "b’nei nevi’im," decendants of the prophets. So let us consider some of the challenging ideas of the prophets whom we are to take as our models. The statements below about the prophets and related issues are from the words of Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, one of my great heroes. It is particularly fitting that we consider these teachings now because Rabbi Heschel’s 32nd Yohrtzei (anniversary of his death) started on the evening of December 29th this year, and this Shabbat we begin reading in synagogues the Torah portions about Moses, the greatest of the prophets, and how he helped free the Israelis from slavery in Egypt and led them for 40 years in the wilderness.

Here are some of Rabbi Heschel’s writings about the prophets:

The prophets were some of the most disturbing people who ever lived.

Their task was to convey a divine view.

Their words are onslaughts, scuttling illusions of false security, challenging evasions, calling faith to account, questioning prudence and impartiality.

The prophet was a person who said no to his society, condemning its habits and assumptions, its complacency, waywardness, syncretism.

The prophet is a man who feels fiercely. His ear is attuned to a cry imperceptible to others.

The prophet is an iconoclast, challenging the apparently holy, revered and awesome.

The prophets knew that man could distort what the Lord demanded of man...

Behind his austerity is love and compassion for mankind.

The prophet disdains those for whom God’s presence is comfort and security; to him it is a challenge, an incessant demand.

The prophets' great contribution to humanity was the discovery of the evil of indifference. One may be decent and sinister, pious and sinful.

The prophet is a person who suffers the harms done to others. Wherever a crime is committed, it is as if the prophet were the victim and the prey. The prophet's angry words cry. The wrath of God is a lamentation. All prophecy is one great exclamation: God is not indifferent to evil! He is always concerned, He is personally affected by what man does to man. He is a God of pathos.

The prophets passionately proclaim that God himself is concerned with "the transitory social problems," with the blights of society, with the affairs of the market place.

What is the essence of being a prophet? A prophet is a person who holds God and men in one thought at one time, at all times. Our tragedy begins with the segregation of God, with the bifurcation of the secular and sacred. We worry more about the purity of dogma than about the integrity of love. We think of God in the past tense and refuse to realize that God is always present and never, never past; that God may be more intimately present in slums than in mansions, with those who are smarting under the abuse of the callous. (From "Religion and Race," in The Insecurity of Freedom , pp. 110-111.)

********************

"The beginning of prayer is praise. The power of worship is song. To worship is to join the cosmos in praising God. . . . Prayer is meaningless unless it is subversive, unless it seeks to overthrow and to ruin the pyramids of callousness, hatred, opportunism, falsehoods. The liturgical movement must become a revolutionary movement, seeking to overthrow the forces that continue to destroy the promise, the hope, the vision." ("On Prayer," pp. 257-267, Moral Grandeur and Spiritual Audacity, Susannah Heschel, ed. (Farrar Straus Giroux, 1996).

Inspired by the words of the prophets, Rabbi Heschel wrote: "Our civilization is in need of redemption. The evil, the falsehood, the vulgarity of our way of living cry to high heaven. There is a war to be waged against the vulgar, against the glorification of power, a war that is incessant, universal. There is much purification that needs to be done, ought to be done, and could be

done through bringing to bear the radical wisdom, the sacrificial devotion, the uncompromising loyalty of our forefathers upon the issues of our daily living."

I hope that we will also be inspired by the teachings of the biblical prophets as we respectfully challenge the religious establishments re vegetarianism and related issues.

Return to Top

=========================
3. The World Threatened as Perhaps Never Before

The world is arguably threatened as never before today, in terms of global climate change (with the respected Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicting a 2.5 to 10.4 degrees Fahrenheit in the next 100 years), species disappearing at the fastest rate in history, the destruction of tropical rain forests, widening droughts, and many other environmental threats, all of which have strong connections of animal-based diets. When we try to feed not only the world’s 6.3 billion people, but also 50 billion farmed animals, it requires far more land, water, fuel, and other resources than plant-based diets would, and contributes to many environmental threats and widespread hunger (seventy percent of the grain produced in North America is fed to animals destined for slaughter). Although ignored by many, animal-based diets are also contributing to an epidemic of chronic, degenerative diseases, and attempts to cure these diseases has required huge expenditures which has resulted in major changes in our health care systems.

There is a need for major changes if the world is to avoid increasingly severe threats. In 1992, over 1,670 scientists, including 104 Nobel laureates -- a majority of the living recipients of the Prizes in the sciences -- signed a "World Scientists' Warning To Humanity." Their introduction states: "Human beings and the natural world are on a collision course. Human activities inflict harsh and often irreversible damage on the environment and on critical resources. If not checked, many of our current practices put at serious risk the future that we wish for human society and the plant and animal kingdoms, and may so alter the living world that it will be unable to sustain life in the manner that we know. Fundamental changes are urgent if we are to avoid the collision our present course will bring about.

The scientists’ analysis discussed threats to the atmosphere, rivers and streams, oceans, soil, living species, and forests. Their warning: "We the undersigned, senior members of the world's scientific community, hereby warn all humanity of what lies ahead. A great change in our stewardship of the earth and the life on it is required, if vast human misery is to be avoided and our global home on this planet is not to be irretrievably mutilated."

I believe that it is essential to help make people aware of the many threats to humanity as we continue to promote a shift toward vegetarian/vegan diets as an essential part of the necessary changes. When we consider all of the negative environmental and climate-change effects, and then add the harmful effects of animal-based diets on human health and global hunger, it is clear that animal-centered diets and the livestock agriculture needed to sustain them pose tremendous threats to global survival. It is not surprising that the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) ranks the consumption of meat and poultry as the second most harmful consumer activity (surpassed only by the use of cars and light trucks).

Return to Top

=========================
4. Vegetarianism as a Societal Imperative

Because of the many great threats to humanity, and the major role that animal-based agriculture plays in many of these threats (as discussed in many previous messages), a shift toward a plant-based diet is not only an important individual choice today, “it is a societal imperative, essential for global sustainability and fiscal solvency.

A shift toward vegetarianism is arguably the most effective way to:

1) reduce disease rates sharply;
2) halt soaring medical costs;
3) reduce the mistreatment of animals;
4) protect the environment;
5) conserve resources;
6) help hungry people;
7) reduce violence.

The aims of vegetarians and environmental activists are similar: simplify our life styles, have regard for the earth and all forms of life, and apply the knowledge that "the earth is the Lord's." In view of the many negative effects of animal-based agriculture on the earth's environment, resources, and climate, it is becoming increasingly clear that a shift toward vegetarianism is imperative to move our precious but imperiled planet away from its present catastrophic path.

Return to Top

=========================
5. Vegetarianism as a Spiritual Imperative

There are many violations of Jewish teachings associated with the production and consumption of animal products:

* While Judaism mandates that people should be very careful about preserving their health and their lives, numerous scientific studies have linked animal-based diets directly to heart disease, stroke, many forms of cancer, and other chronic degenerative diseases.

While Judaism emphasizes tsa'ar ba'alei chayim, the prohibition against causing needless suffering for animals, animals are raised for food today under cruel conditions, in crowded, confined cells, where they are denied fresh air, exercise, and any natural existence.

* While Judaism teaches that "the earth is the Lord's" (Psalm 24:1) and that we are to be God's partners and co-workers in preserving the world, modern intensive livestock agriculture contributes substantially to soil erosion and depletion, air and water pollution, overuse of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, the destruction of tropical rain forests and other habitats, global climate change, and other environmental damages.

* While Judaism mandates bal tashchit, not to waste or unnecessarily destroy anything of value, or use more than is needed to accomplish a purpose, animal agriculture requires the wasteful use of land, water, fuel, grain, and other resources.

* While Judaism stresses that we are to assist the poor and share our bread with hungry people, an estimated twenty million human beings worldwide die each year because of hunger and its effects, over 70% of the grain grown in the U.S. is fed to animals destined for slaughter. It takes up to sixteen pounds of grain to produce just one pound of feedlot-finished beef.

* While Judaism stresses that we must seek and pursue peace and that violence results from unjust conditions, animal-centered diets, by wasting valuable resources, perpetuate the widespread hunger and poverty that often lead to instability and war.

Return to Top

=========================
6. Getting Vegetarianism Onto the Jewish Agenda

Based on the contradictions between the realities of the production and consumption of animals and basic Jewish values discussed above, we should very respectfully raise the following question In discussions: In view of Judaism's strong teachings with regard to preserving human health, treating animals with compassion, protecting the environment, conserving resources, and helping the hungry, and the very negative effects that the production and consumption of meat has in each of these areas, shouldn't Jews eliminate or sharply reduce their consumption of animal products?

Some other questions and arguments that we should use to respectfully challenge the establishment are:

* Since Jews can only mistreat or kill animals to meet an essential human need, and it is not necessary to consume animal products in order to maintain good health (the contrary is the case), how can we justify the slaughtering of animals for food?

* Could G-d possibly prefer us to have an animal-based diet when the production and consumption of animal products harm our health, mistreat animals, threaten ecosystems, waste resources, and make war and violence more likely? In fact, doesn't the Torah only allow the consumption of meat under numerous restrictions, as a concession to human desire?

* Why is it that while some Jews are building fences around some ritual mitzvot, other mitzvot such as tikkun olam (repair the world), bal tashchit (do not waste resources), bakesh shalom v'rodef shalom (seek peace and pursue it), and tsa'ar ba'alei chayim (do not cause "pain to living creatures") are often ignored?

* Can we justify the force-feeding of ducks and geese to create pate de foie gras? Can we justify taking day-old calves from their mothers so that they can be raised for veal in very cramped conditions? Can we justify the killing of over 250 million male chicks immediately after birth at egg-laying hatcheries because they cannot produce eggs and have not been genetically programmed to be able to have much flesh? Can we justify artificially impregnating cows every year so that they will be able to continue to produce milk? Can we justify the many other horrors of factory farming?

As b'nei nevi'im, with a mandate to be "a light onto the nations" and G-d's witnesses, can we remain silent when so many basic Jewish values are being violated and while present policies are leading the world to an unsustainable future?

Since we are to be "rachmanim b'nei rachmanim" (compassionate children of compassionate ancestors), we worship a G-d who is "Harachamon" (the compassionate One) and "Av Harachamim' (the Father of mercies), and "the soul of all living beings shall praise G-d's name", can we continue to partake so heavily in a diet that involves so much cruelty to animals?

I have been thinking about how we can express the case for Jewish vegetarianism in the simplest way. Here is my "first draft", and I would welcome input very much.

a. Judaism teaches that we may not harm animals unless an essential human need will be met that cannot easily be met in any other way.

b. It is NOT NECESSARY to eat meat (or to consume any animal product. We can sustain our lives completely on plant foods. As a matter of fact, animal-centered diets have very negative effects on human health, on the environment, on hungry people, and on animals, and are very wasteful of resources.

c. Possible conclusion: Consuming animal products seems to be contrary to halacha (Jewish law).

Perhaps, we should adapt the song, "It ain't necessarily so", and make our message to the Jewish community, "It ain't necessary, and SO?" The SO is meant to question the Jewish community as to why animal-centered diets are continuing, when they appear to violate basic Jewish mandates.

Return to Top

=========================
7. Avoiding Criticism of our Views

We have an extremely powerful case for vegetarianism based on Jewish teachings and the realities of the widespread production and consumption of animal products, and we should take every opportunity to engage as many people as possible in dialogues about it, while striving to avoid arguments and comparisons that will turn people off and/or give them a chance to shift the focus of the discussion.

Here are some considerations:

* We should always be respectful.

* We should stress that we are trying to start respectful dialogues, not to assert that we have the complete truth.

* We should also stress that we are not arguing that Jews are forbidden from eating meat, but, rather that Jews have a choice in their diets, but we believe that this choice should be based on a consideration of the realities of producing and consuming animal products and how they impinge on Jewish values.

* We should acknowledge that Judaism teaches that people have been given dominion over animals, but that our sages interpret this as "responsible stewardship," so our "dominion" obligates us to treat the earth and the animals on it with reverence and care.

* We should also acknowledge that Judaism teaches that only human beings are created in G-d’s image, but this too is positive for our causes, because it mandates that we imitate G-d’s positive attributes of compassion, justice, and concern for the earth and its inhabitants.

Return to Top

=========================
8. Final Thoughts and Action Ideas

It is urgent that vegetarianism be put squarely on the Jewish agenda, and on other agendas, because the revitalization of Judaism and the sustainability of the global environment depend on a shift to plant-based diets.

In trying to get the issue of vegetarianism onto the Jewish agenda (and other agendas), we are willing, ready, and able to discuss or respectfully debate "Should Jews (and everyone else) Be Vegetarians?" We are also calling for the formation of a commission of rabbis, other Jewish scholars, health experts, nutritionists, environmentalists, and other objective experts to investigate the realities of the production and consumption of animal products and how they impinge on basic Jewish values.

We should also point out that additional information may be obtained at JewishVeg.com, from my book Judaism and Vegetarianism, and from books by Roberta Kalechofsky, including Vegetarian Judaism.

ACTION IDEAS As indicated above, vegetarianism is increasingly a societal imperative because of the many negative environmental and economic effects of the mass production and widespread consumption of animal products. Hence, since it is essential that people shift toward vegetarianism, here are some suggestions to promote plant-based diets:

1) Become well informed. Learn the facts about vegetarianism from the JVNA web site (JewishVeg.com), including my over 100 articles at JewishVeg.com/schwartz and other Internet and printed sources. Learn how to effectively answer questions about vegetarianism, and use such questions as an opportunity to inform others.

2) Help educate others about vegetarianism. Wear a button. Put a bumper sticker on your car. Make up and display posters. Write timely letters to the editors of your local newspapers. Set up programs and discussions. There are a wide variety of interesting vegetarian slogans on buttons, bumper sticker s, and T-shirts and sweat shirts. For example:

Love animals. Don't eat them.
Vegetarianism is good for life.
Happiness is reverence for life. Be vegetarian.
Use the world vegetarian symbol on correspondence. This will help the vegetarian movement obtain publicity that it badly needs and, because of prohibitive costs, cannot be easily obtained otherwise. Stickers and rubber stamps with the world vegetarian symbol can be obtained from the International Jewish Vegetarian Society.

3) Use the material in this message and other vegetarian sources in discussions with doctors. Help increase their knowledge of the many health benefits of a vegetarian diet

4) Ask the rabbi of your synagogue if Jews should eliminate or at least sharply reduce their consumption of meat today because of important Jewish principles such as bal tashchit, tsa'ar ba'alei chayim, and pikuach nefesh that are being violated. Ask if these concepts can be included in sermons and classes.

5) Request that meat or fish not be served at synagogue and Jewish organizational functions and celebrations. Ask school principals and school directors to provide students with nutritious vegetarian options.

6) Ask the rabbi and/or head of a Hebrew school to organize a trip to a slaughterhouse so that people can observe for themselves how animals are slaughtered. A trip to a factory farm to see how cattle, chickens, and other animals are raised would also be very instructive.

7) Arrange synagogue and Jewish organizational sessions where vegetarian dishes are sampled and recipes exchanged.

8) Speak or organize an event with a guest speaker on the advantages of vegetarianism and how vegetarianism relates to Judaism.

9) Get vegetarian books into public and synagogue libraries by donating duplicates, requesting that libraries purchase such books, and, if you can afford it, by buying some and donating them. Ask local librarians to set up special exhibits about vegetarian foods and vegetarian-related issues. I am offering complimentary copies of my book "Judaism and Vegetarianism" and a related tape cassette to anyone who contacts me and indicates how he or she would use it to help increase awareness of Jewish teachings on vegetarianism.

10) Work with others to set up a vegetarian food co-op or restaurant or help support such places if they already exist. Encourage people to patronize such establishments.

11) Register yourself with a community, library, or school speakers' bureau. Take advantage of your increased knowledge and awareness to start speaking out.

12) Contact the food editor of your local newspaper and ask that more vegetarian recipes be included.

13) When applicable, raise awareness by showing how values of the Sabbath and festivals are consistent with vegetarian concepts. For example: Point out that the kiddush recited before lunch on the Sabbath indicates that animals are also to be able to rest on the Sabbath day; on Sukkot, note that the sukkah (temporary dwelling place) is decorated with pictures and replicas of fruits and vegetables (never with animal products); on Yom Kippur, consider the mandate expressed in the prophetic reading of Isaiah to "share your bread with the hungry," which can be carried out best by not having a diet that wastes large amounts of land, grain, water, fuel, and other agricultural resources.

14) Join the International Jewish Vegetarian Society, the Jewish Vegetarians of North America (addresses given later) and local vegetarian groups.

15) Support groups that are working to reduce world hunger, especially, these groups that generally go beyond merely providing charitable aid to the needy, but rather strive, in accordance with Maimonides' concept of the highest form of charity, to make people self-reliant in producing their own food.

16) If people are not willing to become vegetarians, encourage them to at least make a start by giving up red meat and having one or two meatless meals a week (perhaps Mondays and Thursdays, which were traditional Jewish fast days).

17) Do not concentrate only on vegetarianism. It is only part of the pursuit of justice, compassion, and peace. Become aware and try to affect public policy with regard to vegetarian-related issues: preserving health, showing compassion for animals, saving human lives, conserving resources, helping hungry people, and see king and pursuing peace. If you ever feel overwhelmed by the many crises facing the world today and the difficulties of trying to move people toward vegetarian diets, please consider the following: Jewish tradition teaches, "It is not for you to complete the task, but neither are you free to desist from it" We must make a start and do whatever we can to improve the world. Judaism teaches that a person is obligated to protest when there is evil and to proceed from protest to action Each person should imagine that the world is evenly balanced between good and evil and that his or her actions can determine the destiny of the entire world. Even if little is accomplished, trying to make improvements will prevent the hardening of your heart and will affirm that you accept moral responsibility. The ver y act of consciousness raising is important because it may lead to future changes.

Return to Top

=========================
Appendix: Some Jewish Teachings On Involvement and Protest

The following is from the preliminary section of my book, "Judaism and Global Survival."

INVOLVEMENT AND PROTEST

Whoever is able to protest against the transgressions of his own family and does
not do so is punished [liable, held responsible] for the transgressions of his
family. Whoever is able to protest against the transgressions of the people of
his community and does not do so is punished for the transgressions of his
community. Whoever is able to protest against the transgressions of the entire
world and does not do so is punished for the transgressions of the entire world.
(Babylonian Talmud Shabbat 54b)
Judaism urges active involvement in issues facing society. A Jew must not be concerned only about his or her own personal affairs when the community is in trouble:

If a person of learning participates in public affairs and serves as judge or
arbiter, he gives stability to the land. But if he sits in his home and says to
himself, "What have the affairs of society to do with me? ... Why should I
trouble myself with the people's voices of protest? Let my soul dwell in peace!"
-- if he does this, he overthrows the world.

Judaism teaches that people must struggle to create a better society. The Torah frequently admonishes: "And you shall eradicate the evil from your midst" (Deuteronomy 13:6, 17:7, 21:21, 24:7). Injustice can not be passively accepted; it must be actively resisted and, ultimately, eliminated. The Talmudic sages teach that one reason Jerusalem was destroyed was because its citizens failed in their responsibility to constructively criticize one another’s improper behavior. They indicate that "Love which does not contain the element of criticism is not really love."

The essential elements of Jewish practice include devotion to Torah, study, prayer, performing good deeds and other mitzvot (Commandments), and cultivating a life of piety. But, as indicated in the following Midrash (a rabbinic story or teaching based on Biblical events or concepts), in order to be considered pious, a person must protest against injustice. Even God is challenged to apply this standard in judging people:


R. Acha ben R. Chanina said: Never did a favorable decree go forth from the mouth of the Holy One which He withdrew and changed into an unfavorable judgment, except the following: "And the Lord said to His angel: 'Go through the city, through Jerusalem, and put a mark upon the foreheads of the men who sigh and groan over all the abominations that are committed there"' (Ezekiel 9:4). (Thus, they will be protected from the angels who are slaying the wicked.)

At that moment, the indignant prosecutor came forward in the Heavenly Court.

Prosecutor: Lord, wherein are these (marked ones) different from those (the rest)?

God: These are wholly righteous men, while those are wholly wicked.

Prosecutor: But Lord, they had the power to protest, but did not.

God: I knew that had they protested, they would not have been heeded.

Prosecutor: But Lord, if it was revealed to You, was it revealed to them? Accordingly, they should have protested and incurred scorn for thy holy Name, and have been ready to suffer blows... as the prophets of Israel suffered.

God revoked his original order, and the righteous were found guilty, because of their failure to protest. (Shabbat 55a, Tanchuma Tazria 9)

Hence, it is not sufficient merely to do mitzvot while acquiescing in unjust conditions. The Maharal of Prague, a sixteenth-century sage, states that individual piety pales in the face of the sin of not protesting against an emerging communal evil, and a person will be held accountable for not preventing wickedness when capable of doing so. One of the most important dangers of silence in the face of evil is that it implies acceptance or possibly even support. According to Rabbeinu Yonah, a medieval sage, sinners may think to themselves, "Since others are neither reproving nor contending against us, our deeds are permissible."

Rabbi Joachim Prinz, a refugee from pre-World War II Nazi Germany and former president of the American Jewish Congress, spoke to the 250,000 people who took part in the "March on Washington" organized by the Reverend Martin Luther King and others in 1963 on behalf of Civil Rights. He stated that under Hitler's rule, he had learned about the problem of apathy toward fellow human beings: "Bigotry and hatred are not the most urgent problem. The most urgent, the most disgraceful, the most shameful and most tragic problem is silence."

Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, a leading twentieth century philosopher, believed that apathy toward injustice results in greater wickedness. He writes that "indifference to evil is more insidious than evil itself " and that silent acquiescence leads to evil being accepted and becoming the rule.

Jews are required to protest against injustice and to try to agitate for change even when successful implementation appears very difficult. The Talmudic sage Rabbi Zera states, "Even though people will not accept it, you should rebuke them." We can never be sure that our words and actions will be ineffective. Thus the only responsible approach is to try our best. In Rabbi Tarfon’s famous formulation in the Mishna:
It is not your obligation to complete the task. But neither are you free to desist from it.
Just as many drops of water can eventually carve a hole in a rock, many small efforts can eventually have a major impact.

There are times when a person must continue to protest in order to avoid being corrupted:
A man stood at the entrance of Sodom crying out against the injustice and evil
in that city. Someone passed by and said to him, "For years you have been urging
the people to repent, and yet no one has changed. Why do you continue?" He
responded: "When I first came, I protested because I hoped to change the people
of Sodom. Now I continue to cry out, because if I don't, they will have changed
me."
In his article "The Rabbinic Ethics of Protest," Rabbi Reuven Kimelman observes that the means of protest must be consistent with responsibility to the community. He states that protest must involve both love and truth since love implies the willingness to suffer, and truth, the willingness to resist. Together, he concludes, they encompass an approach of nonviolent resistance, toward the ends of justice and peace. The Talmud teaches that controversy and protest must be "for the sake of Heaven". The protest of Korach against the rule of Moses in the wilderness (Numbers 16:1-35) is considered negatively by the Jewish tradition because it was based on jealousy and personal motives.


The result of failing to speak out against injustice is well expressed by the following statement by the German theologian Martin Niemoller:
In Germany, the Nazis first came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up
because I was not a Jew. Then they came for the communists, and I didn't speak up because I was not a communist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the gypsies, and I didn't speak up because I was not a gypsy. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was not a Catholic. Then they came for me ... and by that time, there was no one to speak up for me.
Quoted from Jack Doueck, The Chesed Boomerang: How Acts of Kindness Enrich Our Lives, Deal, New Jersey: Yagdiyl Torah Publicatios, 1999, 83.

Return to Top

December 27, 2004

Special JVNA Newsletter - Postville Slaughterhouse Case #8

12/27/04
Shalom everyone,

This special Jewish Vegetarians of North America (JVNA) Online Newsletter is the eighth follow-up to the JVNA newsletter on the Postville slaughterhouse issue sent out on December 1. It includes much material from various perspectives to give you an idea of some of the latest developments. For additional information, please do an Internet search for recent articles and/or check web sites of PETA, the OU, and other involved groups (please see item #1 below).

This newsletter has the following items:

1. Postville-related Blog

2. My Postville-related article is now on the Internet

3. Article by Agudath Israel Spokesperson/My Comments Interspersed

4. PETA’s Response to the Above Agudath Israel Article

5. Articles by Agriprocessors Lawyer Challenges PETA/My Comments Interspersed

6. More Letters to the Editor in the Jerusalem Post

7. Postville Issue Discussed on National Public Radio

8. Example of Responses To Videotapes of Postville Procedures

Some material has been deferred to a later update/newsletter to keep this one from being even longer.

[Materials in brackets like this [ ] within an article or forwarded message are my editorial notes/comments.]

Opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the views of the JVNA, unless otherwise indicated, but may be presented to increase awareness and/or to encourage respectful dialogue. Also, information re conferences, retreats, forums, trips, and other events does not necessarily imply endorsements by JVNA, but may be presented for informational purposes. Please use e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, and web sites to get further information about any event that you are interested in.
As always, your comments and suggestions are very welcome.

Thanks,
Richard

=========================
1. Postville-related Blog

Much valuable material and interesting commentary re the Postville glatt kosher slaughterhouse controversy can be found at Failedmessiah.com. I do not know the source of the material and I do not endorse all the material at the site, but I have found important documents and significant commentary there. As indicated above, for additional information, please do an Internet search for recent articles and/or check web sites of the OU, PETA, and other involved groups.

I also have posted some messages there.

Return to Top

=========================
2. My Postville-related article is now on the Internet at www.aquarianonline.com (a few headlines down).

WILL THE POSTVILLE HORRORS SHOCK US INTO RETURNING TO JEWISH VALUES?

This article, which also appeared in previous JVNA newsletters, attempts to use the Postville slaughterhouse situation as a means of showing that animal-based diets and modern intensive “livestock” agriculture violate at least six basic Jewish mandates.

Return to Top

=========================
3. Article by Agudath Israel Spokesperson/My Comments Interspersed

THE PETA PRINCIPLE
Now that the blood has settled, a clearer perspective might be had about the recent brouhaha over shechita, or Jewish ritual slaughter, at a meat-processing plant in Iowa.
Rabbi Avi Shafran
http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/jewishsociety/The_Shechita_Controversy.asp

[*** My respectful comments are interspersed below. I am aware of the many positive activities that the Agudath Israel (and the OU) carry out for the benefit of klal Yisrael (the Jewish people), but I feel that Rabbi Shafran’s thoughtful article deserves a response. My comments will be in brackets and preceded with ***]

Yes, the beginning of that sentence was meant to jar. Blood and attendant unpleasantness are part and parcel of the process of turning livestock into meat, and most people are content to interact only with the final product.

[*** A point that is generally overlooked is that the blood and unpleasantness produce a product that is not needed for proper nutrition, and, indeed, has very negative effects on human health and that of our imperiled planet.]

Some, though, choose not to do even that. They include people who are repulsed by the thought of eating what was once alive, and others who feel that meat consumption is a wasteful use of natural resources. Yet others shun meat for health or religious reasons.

[*** Yes, as the Jewish Vegetarians of North America (JVNA) have often pointed out, the production and consumption of meat and other animal products violate at least six basic Jewish mandates. So, it is not surprising that some Jews have decided to be vegetarians.]

And then there are the folks at People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, or PETA, who object to all killing of animals because, as Ingrid Newkirk, the group’s co-founder and president, famously put it, “a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy” – because of their belief, in other words, that animals are no different from humans.

[*** The complete statement is that when it comes to feeling pain, “a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy.” Since Rabbi Shafran’s columns often properly point out distortions in media coverage, I think that it is important to give the context for quotations that he gives.]

The Jewish religious tradition forbids causing animals unnecessary pain.

[*** Absolutely, as JVNA often points out. But, why then do Jewish leaders fail to speak out against the many abuses of animals on factory farms? For example, the killing almost immediately after birth of 250 million male chicks in the U.S. alone at egg-laying hatcheries because they can’t lay eggs and they are not of the breed (broilers) that have been genetically programmed to provide much meat; taking calves from their mothers after one day to raise them as veal; the force feeding of ducks and geese to produce foie gras; raising hens in spaces so small that they can’t raise even one wing, and then debeaking them to prevent them from pecking other hens in their very crowded, unnatural conditions; and much more.]

And there are observant Jews who are vegetarians; our tradition even teaches that the first man and woman – indeed all of humanity until Noah – were divinely forbidden to eat meat. But the Jewish faith expressly permits the killing of animals for human needs, including food. Which animals may be eaten and how to dispatch them are topics dealt with at considerable length in Jewish legal literature.

[*** Today, with our knowledge of scientific nutrition and with nutritional experts indicating that one can be properly nourished and even healthier without animal products in the diet, where is the “human need” met by slaughtering animals for food?]

Indeed, the “PETA Principle,” the moral equating of animals and humans, is an affront to the very essence of Jewish belief, which exalts the human being, alone among G-d’s creations, as, among other things, the possessor of free will, a being capable of choosing to do good or bad. That distinction is introduced in Genesis, where the first man is commanded to “rule over” the animal world.

[*** Yes, but “dominion” is interpreted by our sages as “responsible stewardship or guardianship,” and that humans are uniquely created in G-d’s image should obligate us to imitate G-d’s attributes of mercy and justice, not to unnecessarily slaughter 50 billion animals annually worldwide to produce products that are having such negative effects.]

The notion that humans are mere animals can lead to ethical obscenities, like PETA’s appeal to the director of the federal penitentiary where Timothy McVeigh was awaiting execution, that the mass murderer not be served meat so that he “not be allowed to take even one more life.” Or the group’s lodging of a protest with Yasir Arafat over a terrorist attack because the donkey carrying the explosives detonated in the attack was killed. Or its “Holocaust on Your Plate” campaign, comparing the killing of chickens and cows to the murder of Jewish men, women and children. Or solemn declarations like Ms. Newkirk’s that “Six million Jews died in concentration camps, but six billion broiler chickens will die this year in slaughterhouses.”

[*** JVNA disagrees with many of PETA’s positions and actions and we have urged changes. We should strive to end the mistreatment of animals, not because of PETA, but because of basic Jewish teachings. We should not use the beliefs and actions of our critics to excuse us from doing what Jewish values demand.]
[*** Also, PETA, to its credit, has asserted on its web site and in public statements that shechita is a superior method of slaughter when it is properly carried out. They have focussed on the Postville plant and they gave the operators a chance to improve conditions, before secretly videotaping at the Postville slaughterhouse.]

And so when PETA launched a media blitz several weeks ago, sending scores of journalists and others copies of surreptitiously filmed and carefully edited videotapes of animals being slaughtered at the AgriProcessors plant in Postville, Iowa – the largest producer of “glatt” – or highest-standard – kosher meat in the nation – the immediate reaction on the part of some Jewish organizations and many of those in the kosher food industry was understandably negative.

The video, to be sure, was disturbing. Although the PETA “mole” who secretly recorded the film likely witnessed thousands of unremarkable slaughters during his months on the job, the edited film showed a number of animals that seemed conscious after the act of shechita. In one case, an animal even righted itself and took several steps before collapsing.

Every method of animal slaughter yields a small percentage of such unfortunate results, when some degree of consciousness persists longer than it should. What PETA claims, though, is that what was depicted on its edited video of operations at the Iowa plant represents fully a quarter of the animals slaughtered over the seven-week period during which the video was made.

There is reason to be skeptical about this claim. A subsequent visit to the plant by Dr. I.M. Levinger, a veterinary surgeon and physiologist, yielded his testimony that, of the as many as 150 animals he saw slaughtered over the course of his two-day visit, only a single cow exhibited any conscious activity after shechita.

[*** This shows that the slaughterhouse operators have the ability to carry out the slaughtering process in a much more effective method than was revealed on the videotapes. An important word in the above paragraph is “subsequent,” a word that sharply reduces the importance of the observations.]

What is more, USDA inspectors are typically present on the killing floor during animal slaughter, to ensure that the process complies with federal standards. The inspectors present at the Postville plant during the period PETA compiled the images in its video presumably saw the entire picture, and never complained about any inordinately high number of post-slaughter displays of consciousness. A high-level USDA official, for that matter, visited the plant after PETA released its video to personally observe the allegedly inhumane practices and take appropriate action; what he saw apparently persuaded him that there was no need to shut down the plant or alter its basic practices.

[*** One would think that inspectors would be around during the slaughtering process, but several sources indicate that this is not generally true. They are generally further down the production line, checking for diseases. Even the OU has indicated that conditions at the plant will be changed. And long time animal welfare experts, including Temple Grandin, and experienced veterinarians and some rabbis have indicated their horror at what the video revealed and expressed their strong belief that conditions be changed.]

Likewise, top officials from the kashrut organizations that certify AgriProcessors’ meat visited the plant to monitor the shechita process and found that signs of post-slaughter consciousness were extremely rare. Indeed, Iowa’s Secretary of Agriculture, Patty Judge, who had initially expressed her deep chagrin after watching PETA’s video – even calling for a federal investigation – concluded, after a personal visit to the plant, that the shechita there “…was humane… and there was absolutely no problem with the way they [the animals] were handled.”

[*** Can planned inspections after the PETA videos were distributed be used to show that the conditions before the appearance of the videos were acceptable?]

Those personal observations confirm what scientific theory would have predicted: that the incidence of displays of post-slaughter consciousness is more rare in cases of shechita than when non-kosher methods of slaughter are employed. That is because, as Dr. S.D. Rosen, MA, MD, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, noted earlier this year in a monograph in the Veterinary Record, studies have shown that after the cutting of the trachea, esophagus and carotid arteries – the shechita process in essence – an animal’s consciousness is lost within approximately two seconds, and irreversibly.

[*** Yes, as the JVNA has argued when opposing efforts to single out shechita for criticism, shechita when properly carried out is a superior method of slaughter. Also, in the study cited, the method of slaughter involved a different type of holding pen]

The evidence would appear to suggest, therefore, that PETA is grossly exaggerating the frequency of post-shechita signs of consciousness at the Iowa plant. Perhaps it should not be surprising that PETA’s 25% figure differs so dramatically from what others have seen. Because, while the group’s concern that animals not be caused unnecessary pain is commendable, PETA also has an ultimate, and openly declared, goal: to stop people from eating meat. And so, if a bit of dissembling is necessary to move in that direction, well… wouldn’t you stretch the truth to save Jews from Nazis?

[*** PETA has not tried to stop people from eating meat; they have tried to convince people that it would be better for them, for our threatened environment, for the conservation of resources, for a more humane, less violent world, and, yes, for animals, if they shifted to well-balanced, nutritious diets free of animal products. Since the production and consumption of animal products violate so many Jewish teachings, the wonder is that it is a secular group, and not Agudath Israel, the OU, and most other Jewish groups that is doing this.]

Precision, though, is not the only thing PETA seems prepared to sacrifice in order to achieve its goal. Our nation’s commitment to religious liberty, in PETA’s eyes, is eminently expendable as well.

[*** Can any proof be produced to show that PETA has ever attacked the concept of shechita, called for the consumption of meat to be outlawed, or, in any other way, tried to curtail religious liberty?]

Even though the Iowa plant has discontinued a bleeding-facilitating arterial cut that PETA deemed a “dismemberment” of live animals, the animal rights group is now demanding, among other things, that U.S. government regulations regarding animal slaughter be changed in fundamental ways and that the type of restraining pen required by some decisors of Jewish law be outlawed.

These are not minor points; they touch, and not gently, upon the issue of
rabbinic authority and religious autonomy. And that game is zero-sum: What constitutes proper animal-slaughter methods for observant American Jews will necessarily be determined in the future either by rabbis or by advocates for animal-rights.

[*** Once again, PETA is not calling for the abolition of shechita. Quite the contrary – in the Postville case they are defending it at a time when some have caused shechita to be associated with horrible mistreatment of animals.]

Shechita was attacked and outlawed by the Nazis when they came to power in. Germany. Today, animal rights activists have succeeded in banning it in several European and Scandinavian countries. If PETA’s misleading campaign is not seen for the partisan salvo it is, our own country may be next.

[*** Once again, PETA has defended shechita and publicly called it a superior method. But, if the horrible scenes revealed on the PETA videotapes become associated with shechita, this has the potential of harming shechita, Judaism, and possibly Jews. As one JVNA member stated, “By continuing to defend what happened in the Postville meat-processing plant in Iowa, you are doing more damage to our image than anything PETA might inadvertently do.”]

© AM ECHAD RESOURCES

[Rabbi Avi Shafran is director of public affairs for Agudath Israel of America.]

Am Echad Resources material may be reproduced without charge, provided Am Echad Resources is duly credited.

Return to Top

=========================
4. PETA’s Reply to Rabbi Shafran’s Article (Above)

[JVNA has been critical of PETA’s statements and activities, most recently for their very ill-considered “Holocaust On Your Plate” exhibition, and we will again if necessary. But, PETA has acted responsibly and sensitively in the Postville controversy, focusing on the Postville facility, and reaffirming their belief that shechita, when properly carried out is a superior method of slaughter. I plan to discuss PETA more in my year end statement due out later this week.]

In his recent article titled "The PETA Principle," Rabbi Avi Shafran, director of public affairs for Agudath Israel, offers his thoughts on PETA's campaign for improved animal welfare standards at AgriProcessors. We appreciate Rabbi Shafran's clear concern for animal welfare, and would like to address the issues he raises.

In the wake of the slaughterhouse scandal, AgriProcessors has not been able to find a single scientist, animal welfare expert, or veterinarian who is willing to defend the shoddy slaughter practices we documented.

PETA, on the other hand, has received an outpouring of support from leaders in the veterinary, animal welfare, and even meat industries, as well as in the Jewish community, who were shocked by the brazenly cruel treatment of animals that has, for years, been the norm at
AgriProcessors.

Dr. Temple Grandin, consultant to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the American Meat Institute, did not mince words after viewing the tapes, stating, "I thought it was the most disgusting thing I'd ever seen." Dr. Lester Friedlander, a former USDA kosher slaughter inspector, echoed these sentiments, writing, "The footage captured by PETA represents the most egregious violation of the USDA Humane Methods of Slaughter Act (HMSA) I have ever witnessed."

Our investigator witnessed the slaughter of 278 cattle; one-fourth were clearly and unarguably (according to scientists) still conscious after they were dumped onto the concrete floor, roughly a minute after shechita. Because of a Clinton-era USDA program, no USDA inspectors are assigned to the kill floor, and indeed, there were none there during the five hours that our investigator was there, on six occasions over about seven weeks.

The fact that three weeks later AgriProcessors killed animals properly for Dr. Levinger is encouraging, but this only further validates our position, proving that AgriProcessors could have slaughtered animals humanely all along but choose not to-this is why their actions were illegal.

AgriProcessors recent willingness to invite government inspectors to its plant is like a serial killer calling the police over to his house to watch him not kill people: "See, I'm not killing anyone." Criminals may sometimes act in accordance with the law, but that does not exonerate
them for their crimes.

The humane community is not asking much AgriProcessors; we're asking only that they adopt the widely-accepted regulatory standards for religious slaughter developed by the Food Marketing Institute. These guidelines, which can be read at GoVeg.com or FMI.org, will ensure that AgriProcessors' handling and slaughter practices are in keeping with Judaism's long-standing tradition of kindness to animals.

Striking animals in the face with electric prods, ripping their tracheas and esophagi out while they're fully conscious, slaughtering them in a haphazard way-these things were happening at AgriProcessors, in what can only be seen as a complete denial of Judaism's firm commitment to compassion. All Jews will surely agree that the standards that PETA, along with the Rabbinic Assembly of the Conservative movement and a swelling number of Jews from across the spectrum of Judaism, recommends will ensure that kosher slaughter is consistently quick and humane, as provided for in the Torah.

It is simply true, physiologically, that "where pain is concerned, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy." This does not mean moral equivalency; it simply states that God designed us out of the same stuff (flesh, blood, bone) and with the same capacity to feel pain: No scientist will deny this, because it's true. And watching as they struggle to stand and flee while their windpipes hang from their bloody throats, one cannot deny that the animals at AgriProcessors felt immeasurable agony and fear as they fought against death.

Indeed, our respect for the uniquely human ability to make complex moral calculations is central to our mission. As human beings, as stated in the Torah, we have an obligation to make compassionate choices when confronted with the suffering of others. We both agree with and embrace this understanding as central to our mission. As Rabbi Shafran notes, for many, this calculation leads them to vegetarianism. For all, however, it should lead to profound moral outrage at the horrific and consistent cruelty to animals perpetrated by AgriProcessors for so many years.

In closing, please consider that PETA supplied our video and all relevant documentation and factual support to three government agencies.

Any exaggeration on our part would be criminal in nature and would subject us to forfeiture of our nonprofit status and thus would, most likely, lead to our demise. As the world's largest animal rights organization, with more than 800,000 members and supporters and 25-year history, this is not something we would ever do-both because dishonesty is the opposite of what we stand for and because our mission would be irreparably damaged.

After reviewing the video documentation and reading additional expert and rabbinical testimony at GoVeg.com, readers will surely agree with Rabbi Barry Schwartz of the Central Conference of American Rabbis' Task Force on Kashrut, who said, "The suffering of these animals during
slaughter is sickening. Death is neither quick nor merciful. If this is kosher, then we have a big problem."

For information on Judaism and vegetarianism, please visit the Web site run by the Jewish Vegetarians of North America, at www.JewishVeg.com .

Benjamin Goldsmith is a campaign coordinator for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).

Comments by JVNA reader, Maida:

Here was my comment to the Aish Hatorah web site (URL at the top of the article above):

As far as I can tell PETA's primary concern is the most humane conditions for animals, which should also be the primary concern of shechita. Jews have often been their own worst enemies and I think this is the case here. By continuing to defend what happened in the Postville meat-processing plant in Iowa, you are doing more damage to our image than anything PETA might inadvertently do. I am sure that PETA has absolutely no interest in provoking anti-Semitism. They only want to have Jews react to flaws in what is supposed to be a better system.

Return to Top

=========================
5. Articles by Agriprocessors Lawyer Challenges PETA/My Comments Interspersed

Some Questions For PETA
Nathan Lewin

[*** As in the above article by Rabbi Shafran, my respectful comments are interspersed below, preceded by ***.]

People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals recently released a video bearing the incendiary title “PETA Undercover: Terrified Cows Stagger to Their Feet After Workers Rip Out Their Throats.” Visitors to the PETA Web site are told to watch the video and see “AgriProcessors workers ignore the suffering of cows that are still sensible to pain after having their throats slit by the ritual slaughterer. The animals stagger and slip in blood while their tracheas dangle from their necks. Watch now.”

The attack on shechita, kosher ritual slaughter, follows the line almost in precise words that has been taken for centuries by anti-Semites, culminating in Hitler’s laws enacted in April 1933 to protect Germany’s animals against the savagery of the Jewish ritual. (Der Stuermer’s 1938 description of “How Jews Torture Animals” described two German boys watching the animal after shechita “struggle to get up and then collapse” and, after a second cut by the Jew, “the blood spurts, and again the animal struggles to get up.”)

[*** There are certainly major differences here. First, PETA gave AgriProcessors, the slaughterhouse operators, a chance to correct things before they sent a volunteer to videotape conditions at the slaughterhouse. Second, PETA is focussing on the one plant and is seeking improvements that will reduce the suffering of animals. Third, PETA has made it clear through its web site and public statements that it regards shechita as a superior form of slaughter, when it is properly done. JVNA has been critical of some of PETA’s beliefs and actions, and plans to continue to do so, but the use of misleading statements about PETA does not do credit to shechita and other Jewish teachings.]

No matter that mounds of scientific evidence establish that an animal that loses blood to the brain loses any sense of pain. No matter that the shechita cut results in anemia of the brain within 2 seconds. No matter that the U.S. Congress held extensive hearings in 1957 and concluded that the Jewish ritual method of slaughter is at least as humane as any other method that modern science has devised. PETA’s “food specialists” and Ph.Ds know the cow that has its throat slit “suffers” and is “still sensible.”

[Mr. Lewin’s statements in this paragraph ignore the statements of many animal welfare experts, including the world renowned Temple Grandin, experienced veterinarians, and some rabbis.]

PETA made no such claim when it sent two accusatory letters to AgriProcessors last year, in June and November. I replied to PETA’s first letter that had said it would keep “entirely confidential” its allegation that “Jewish law is being violated” if AgriProcessors would agree to hire Dr. Temple Grandin, which PETA on its Web site calls “the country’s leading slaughter expert,” to institute “humane improvements.” (I noted that this sounded like extortion.) I asked PETA to provide “detailed descriptions of specific conduct to support your conclusions.”

Did PETA claim then that terrified cows were staggering to their feet after workers ripped out their throats? No way. Here is the substance of PETA’s list:

1. Repair your unloading ramps.

2. Restrict the use of electric
prods.

3. Ensure that no more than 5 percent of cows
vocalize.

4. Ensure that each chicken is held one at a time, by one
person, for slaughter.

5. Provide fresh, clean water for all
animals at unloading.

6. Ensure that all animals are calm at all
stages of processing.

7. Engage in self-audits on a regular
basis.

[*** These seven points seem to show that PETA was concerned with minimizing the suffering of animals.]

PETA added in the letter that listed its seven demands (none of which involved violations of Jewish law) that it “would prefer it if AgriProcessors stopped killing animals.” But it did not dare repeat the old anti-Semitic canard that cows with their throats slit by the ritual slaughterer were staggering or struggling.

[*** Jewish law is violated if animals suffer unnecessarily, and this is what PETA’s seven steps are aimed at preventing.]

Only after its investigator took “undercover” videos that would rouse emotions in people who have never seen a slaughtering plant in operation did PETA turn from complaining about “unloading ramps” to its publicized allegation that the throat slitting and what followed was brutal and contrary to Jewish law.

[*** It is not just their allegations, but, as indicated above, the considered opinions of experts on animal treatment and slaughter procedures, and a number of rabbis. Many of their statements, and much more re the Postville situation can be found at GoVeg.com.]

Every respected Orthodox authority on Jewish law has concluded that what was shown on the video was not contrary to Jewish law and that the shechita was 100 percent kosher. Some Orthodox rabbis urged that in order to avoid a public misperception of cruelty, one step in the process — a second cut and removal of the trachea — not be done.

[*** Rabbi David Rosen, former Chief Rabbi of Ireland feels that Jewish law was violated. And the Orthodox rabbis of the OU have requested changes in the procedures at the Postville slaughterhouse.]

It is legitimate, however, to ask PETA a few questions:

* How do you know that the animal that has its throat cut and loses blood flow to the brain is “still sensible?”

[*** Again, PETA’s view is backed up by many experts on animal welfare and veterinary science.]

Three Cambridge University professors (Wood, Barcroft and Newman) authored a report in 1924 on the “Jewish Method of Slaughtering Animals for Food.” They said of the post-shechita movements shown on the video: “Such movements are quite unconnected with sensation. Nevertheless they may appear so purposeful as to convince the lay observer that sensation continues and that the movements are evidence of pain or consciousness.”

Professor William Bayliss of University College in London said in a 1930 study that convulsions “may come on at a stage long after consciousness has ceased” and they “may include raising of the head.”

[*** These studies are many decades old, and they refer to different slaughtering procedures.]

Do you have comparable “undercover” video of a non-kosher slaughtering plant or of another kosher plant?

[*** They do at their web site. Over many years, PETA has taken on a wide variety of animal abuses.]

What transpires in any slaughtering plant is gruesome to watch. Animals are being put to death in order to be eaten.

[*** Why carry out this gruesome process and kill animals to create a product that is not needed for proper nutrition and, indeed, is harmful to human health and environmental sustainability.]

Before condemning any one plant, one in fairness must see what goes on in others. The process in non-kosher plants is less bloody because throat slitting is not the means of killing the animal, but other steps are probably as painful to watch and possibly more painful to the animal.

[*** Is this going to be our defense – that others are just as bad, or worse, especially when some veteran experts indicate that they have never seen such horrendous conditions?]

* Why are you less concerned about the treatment of live animals than about the final minutes of life of animals that are legitimately put to death for human consumption?

I wrote in my letter to PETA that “long before the rest of the world showed any ‘common decency’ to animals or had the slightest concern for the treatment of animals, the laws of the Torah and rabbinic teachings commanded the Jewish people to treat all living creatures humanely. Secular society — including your organization — has still not caught up with the precepts of Jewish law in this regard.”

[*** JVNA agrees re Judaism’s powerful teachings on compassion to animals. But, in view of these teachings, why is Mr. Lewin and many other Jewish leaders ignoring the many abuses on factory farms to 50 billion farmed animas worldwide every year?]

* Why is PETA not concerned, as the Torah is, about animals being overworked?

[*** They are concerned about all types of mistreatment of animals. Because of modern technology, far fewer animals are overworked today than in the past.]

PETA doesn’t demand a Sabbath for living animals or condemn pairing weak and strong animals or muzzling them in the presence of food. The morality of Torah law apparently is not a model for headline-hungry hypocrites who take cheap shots at targets they think cannot fight back.

[*** Again, in view of powerful Jewish teachings on compassion to animals, why isn’t the Jewish community actively involved in ending the horrors occurring daily due to modern, intensive “livestock” agriculture?]

* Why has PETA not taken on horse racing or dog racing, or rodeos or hunting, where live animals are abused for the sport of humans?

[*** They have, and much more.]

Observant Jews are more inviting targets, particularly since they are ready to confess sins even where there are none.

Nathan Lewin, a constitutional lawyer who has represented many Orthodox clients, is counsel for AgriProcessors in Postville, Iowa.

Return to Top

=========================
6. More Letters to the Editor in the Jerusalem Post

Letters to the Editor

THE JERUSALEM POST Dec. 23, 2004

No mitzvah, this

Sir, - Saul Singer did a marvelous job of describing the irony of large animals being tortured at a (glatt!) kosher slaughterhouse in the US ("Cutting-edge kashrut," UpFront, December 17).
Judaism negates a mitzvah that comes as the result of a transgression. Surely, any mitzvah that results from kosher slaughter is nullified if the animal experiences agony in the process, the more so if that suffering is driven by monetary concerns.

MARK FEFFER [Mark is a JVNA advisor.]
Jerusalem
--------------------------
Sir, - Most animals raised in modern-day agriculture suffer immensely even before slaughter. They are subjected to de-beaking, castration and dehorning, all without painkillers, and spend their stress-filled lives in barren warehouses, never setting foot outside.

JOSH TETRICK
Radnor, Pennsylvania
------------------------
Sir, - Kudos for the articles on ethical shehita by Temple Grandin ("Kosher slaughter done right," Upfront, December 17) and Saul Singer. It would be a long-overdue step for the rabbinical establishment to declare treif all food that follows suffering by living creatures.
Gastonomic "delights" such as pate de fois gras or veal, achieved through unspeakably cruel methods, or meat produced by subjecting helpless creatures to inhumane conditions during raising or slaughtering, have no place on a kosher table.

SHIFRA PAIKIN
Jerusalem
-------------------
Sir, - When I ask: "Is it kosher?" (meaning vegan, sustainably produced and fairly traded) I couldn't be more serious.

For me, a diet that does the least unavoidable harm and the most possible good is daily balm to a conscience that almost always has something weighing upon it.

SYD BAUMEL [Syd is also a JVNA advisor who recently made a generous donation to JVNA.]
Founder, Eatkind.net
Winnipeg
------------------------
...Grandin's labor of love

Sir, - Familiar with Temple Grandin's work in autism, which has helped thousands - parents, children, researchers, and simple therapists like myself - I wrote an article about her for Mishpacha magazine. Grandin herself is autistic and a walking resource on the subject.

She asked me, an Orthodox Jew, to approach the OU in America about the disturbing practices during shehita in South America. No one returned my calls.

I asked a rabbi who knew the OU's head to show him my article on Grandin's method of handling animals during shehita. The response came back: "She's a meshuggene."
The accusation that Grandin has a vested interest is falacious. Yes, she designs very expensive equipment. But her goal is more than monetary; it is to change the way people mistreat animals. It is a labor of love.

The issue is not PETA vs. the rabbis. Grandin is a leading researcher in animal science as it relates to slaughter - Jewish, Muslim, and secular.

While highly articulate, she is not capable of understanding concepts as abstract as anti-Semitism. To suggest even a hint of it is ludicrous.

Read Labeled Autistic or Thinking in Pictures and you will clearly see her views on shehita and those who perform it.

BENYOMIN WOLFSON
New York
-------------------
Sir, - The letter by Benjamin Goldsmith, PETA campaign coordinator (December 15), failed to reveal the real agenda of the animal rights movement. [letters]

The video scenes illegally obtained by a PETA representative at AgriProcessors may not have looked pretty to the untrained eye - but all leading rabbis in the US and Israel have subsequently ruled that the shehita was kosher, and that the animals' actions were reflexive, not conscious.

Shehita remains the most humane form of slaughter, a fact protected by US law. A veterinarian and four inspectors of the United States Department of Agriculture observe the kosher slaughter at AgriProcessors at all times, as do nine rabbis.

PETA is against all animal slaughter, which it has grotesquely equated with the Holocaust. It is hardly qualified to tell a 3,000-year-old religion what is humane.

MENACHEM LUBINSKY
Editor, 'Kosher Today'
New York
----------------
This article [letters] can also be read at http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1103776317397&p=1006953079865

Copyright 1995-2004 The Jerusalem Post - http://www.jpost.com/

Return to Top

=========================
7. Postville Issue Discussed on National Public Radio

Forwarded message from Karen Dawn
DawnWatch: Excellent NPR coverage of PETA's horrifying undercover kosher slaughterhouse footage 12/20/04

On Monday, December 20, the National Public Radio show "All Things Considered" gave strong even-handed coverage to the story regarding PETA's undercover footage taken at the AgriProcessors plant, which the story described "the world's largest glatt kosher slaughterhouse," and "the only one in the US certified by Israeli rabbinic authorities."

You can hear the whole five minute story on line at:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4236845

I will summarize it, briefly, below:

The reporter, Greg Allen, describes what one can see on the PETA tape: "A shochet, a ritual slaughterer, uses a sharp knife to cut a steer's throat, and as the blood begins to flow, a second man steps forward and pulls out the animal's trachea. In case after case, the animal struggles to its feet while its windpipe dangles from its open throat."

Arguments on both sides as to whether the practices involve horrendous cruelty or just involuntary post-conscious movements are presented. The story mentions that the footage has been posted to PETA's website. It is PETA's www.GoVeg.com website that has the story front and central; unfortunately that is not noted but hopefully listeners will go to PETA's main site and find their way easily to the footage. Nobody seeing it, who is not strongly invested in believing there to be no cruelty, could watch the footage and interpret the bellowing and staggering, sometimes for minutes, of cows who have risen to their feet, as involuntary movement.

Temple Grandin, who is described as "a veterinarian at Colorado State University," and an "expert on humane slaughtering processes" is not a PETA person. She is a meat-eater who helps design slaughterhouses with the intention of making them more humane. We hear her say:
"My reaction was I just about fell off my chair when I saw this procedure of yanking out the trachea."

Greg Allen reports:
"Grandin, an expert on humane slaughtering practices, has worked closely with dozens of kosher slaughterhouses. Kosher slaughter, she says, can be extremely humane if done well. One sign, Grandin says, that AgriProcessors was not doing things correctly was how many animals tried to get up after having their throats cut. PETA says one-quarter of the 276 animals the group documented showed signs of consciousness after being released from the holding chamber. AgriProcessors disputes that, however, along with most of PETA's other charges. Spokesman Mike Thomas says plant workers don't deliberately remove the animals' tracheas. He says it's sometimes done accidentally. And despite evidence on the tape, Thomas says the vast majority of animals die within seconds."

(Note: "Despite evidence on the tape.")

The story includes strong quotes from PETA's Bruce Friedrich:
"Many of the animals actually struggle and stand for up to three minutes after their throats have been slit open, which are unarguably, according to physiologists, signs of consciousness. What is happening on that slaughter plant line is clear and absolute cruelty to animals."

And to the suggestion that anti Semitism is motivating the campaign, Friedrich responds:
"We've been pretty flummoxed by the fact that anyone would defend the egregious cruelty to animals that is happening in this plant. Judaism actually has more vegetarians than any other faith, except Hinduism, and that's because of the fine Jewish tradition of compassion for animals."

You might like to listen on line, at the link above, to the whole piece. Most importantly, please let "All Things Considered" know its attention to this matter is appreciated. Positive feedback will encourage similar stories in the future. All Things Considered takes comments at:

atc@npr.org

Yours and the animals',
Karen Dawn

(DawnWatch is an animal advocacy media watch that looks at animal issues in the media and facilitates one-click responses to the relevant media outlets. You can learn more about it, and sign up for alerts at http://www.DawnWatch.com.

Return to Top

=========================
8. Example of Responses To Videotapes of Postville Procedures

Below is just one of many letters that I have received expressing outrage at scenes on the videotape. I believe that it indicates why it is so important that it be made clear that the procedures at Postville are not typical of shechita and that they will very soon be changed, and that proper regulations and inspection procedures will also soon be established to insure that shechita is properly carried out.
---------
Dear Richard,

After viewing footage of so-called kosher slaughter, I am horrified beyond description. To call such brutality acceptable is beyond justification.

Such cruelty must not exist in a civilized society, and especially must not be condoned by a religious community who theoretically stands for ethical and humane behavior. What I saw is not humane and not ethical. It is barbarism of the worst kind, and your tacit approval of it is totally unacceptable.

I would appreciate your comments to my concerns.

Lu Haner
9 Sherman Rd.
Millis, MA 02054

Return to Top

=========================
** Fair Use Notice**
This document may contain copyrighted material, use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. I believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

December 24, 2004

12/24/04 JVNA Online Newsletter

Shalom everyone,

This update/Jewish Vegetarians of North America (JVNA) Online Newsletter has the following items:

* Announcements

1. You Can Now Contribute Online to the JVNA

2. Report on the International Vegetarian Congress Meeting Just Completed in Brazil

3. Book Review/Reasons for Vegan Diets

4. Rabbi Menashe of Ilya (1767-1832) on Compassion for Animals

5. Update on NJ Model Nutrition Policy Proposal

6. Important New Book on Global Threats

7. Environmental Impacts of Factory Farms

8. Vegan Courses at the Tree of Life Institute

9. Article on Jewish teachings on Compassion to Animals

10. A Little Humor

Much material has been deferred to a later update/newsletter to keep this one from being even longer.

[Materials in brackets like this [] within an article or forwarded message are my editorial notes/comments.]

Opinions expressed do not necessarily represent the views of the JVNA, unless otherwise indicated, but may be presented to increase awareness and/or to encourage respectful dialogue. Also, information re conferences, retreats, forums, trips, and other events does not necessarily imply endorsements by JVNA, but may be presented for informational purposes. Please use e-mail addresses, telephone numbers, and web sites to get further information about any event that you are interested in.

As always, your comments and suggestions are very welcome.

Thanks,
Richard

=========================
Announcements

* Please note that previous recent newsletters can be found in a convenient form for reading at the JVNA web site at http://JewishVeg.blogspot.com .

We plan to post this one soon. It might be there by the time you are reading this.

* I am still trying to catch up on material for the JVNA newsletters as so much time recently has been devoted to the Postville controversy. So, some material is still being deferred until the next issue.

* I plan to send out an update re Postville in another special newsletter soon. 1. You Can Now Contribute Online to the JVNA

Return to Top

=========================
1. Looking for an end of the year tax deduction?

There is absolutely no obligation to contribute to the JVNA in order to continue to receive JVNA newsletters or to participate in discussions or activities. However, all contributions will be most welcome and would be used for outreach work to help spread the Jewish vegetarian message, by getting literature to rabbis and other Jewish leaders, perhaps by putting ads in newspapers, and in other ways. Suggestions on how to use contributions and/or about other fundraising ideas are very welcome. Thanks.

You can now easily contribute at the bottom of the "What You Can Do" page of the JVNA web site, at http://JewishVeg.com/do.html . If you prefer, you can send a tax deductible donation to the JVNA c/o Eva and Israel Mossman, 6938 Reliance Road, Federalsburg, MD 21632.

Return to Top

=========================
2. Report on the International Vegetarian Congress Meeting Just Completed in Brazil

Forwarded message:

INTERNATIONAL VEGETARIAN UNION
IVU ONLINE NEWS - December, 2004

WE'RE ALL NUTS ABOUT BRAZIL!

The 36th IVU World Vegetarian Congress has come and gone - Brazil is a wonderful country and few of us wanted to come home again. The final tally was about 500 in residence, representing a record breaking number of 32 different countries. The most frequently heard comment was: "this is the best food ever" (100% vegan of course), and many said that the location was the best ever too - the Costao do Santinho was in an idyllic spot on Santa Catarina Island where the tree-covered mountains meet the sea. It has glorious beaches, an amazing variety of wildlife along the woodland trails and facilities of a very high standard in the resort itself. Add to that a tantalizing choice of up to five lectures and two cookery demos at every session (in a mixture of English, Portuguese and Spanish), plus dance and fashion shows in the evenings, and there really was something for everyone.

But this Congress may turn out to have been of greater sigficance, and we need to go back a bit to put it in perspective. The previous 35 IVU Congresses have all been inspiring for those fortunate enoughto attend them, but just a few have achieved a wider role - 1908, 1929, 1957 and 1975 are the most obvious of those. That last one, 1975, was held at the University of Orono, in Maine, USA, and was the first IVU Congress ever to be held in North America. About 1,500 visitors were in residence, still a record outside of India, and recent commentators have seen it as the launch pad for organized vegetarianism in the region. There were vegetarian groups in North America before 1975 of course, the first being as far back as 1850, but they were generally rather small and isolated, along with a large number of even more isolated individuals. After Orono hundreds of vegetarian societies sprang up, along with a dozens of conferences, festivals and publications - many of them founded by people who first met at that extraordinary Congress.

It doesn't always turn out that way of course - there were high hopes that the 1999 Congress, held in Chiang Mai, Thailand, would have a similar effect for the South East Asian region as that was the first there too, but there were never more than a few ripples from it. This isn't the place to analyze why it didn't reach its full potential but it does remind us that we have much to learn about such things.

The 2004 Congress already shows signs of having a much wider impact than just one week in Florianopolis. Until the last few years Latin America was rather a 'dead' region for IVU and this was the first time that anything on this scale had been attempted there. It was always going to be a gamble, but the IVU International Council provided as much support as it could, both practical and financial. The Council then, crucially, stood back and allowed the Brazilians space to run their own show - the result is that all the vegetarian leaders in Latin America will have gained enormous strength and confidence from the stunning achievement that was Florianopolis 2004.

The Argentine Vegetarian Society led the way by holding their first, and highly successful, National Congress just before the IVU event, now they have the support of the Vegetarian Union of Latin America (UVL), launched during the Brazil Congress and which is already planning another meeting in Bolivia next year. The new Union was announced during the IVU General Meeting by one of the Spanish speaking delegates, demonstrating the solidarity between the Spanish and Portuguese speaking veg communities.

The dazzling cruelty-free veg fashion shows, held during the Congress, attracted huge audiences from outside the Congress itself and are now set to become an annual event in their own right. But the biggest result of this Congress has to be the wonderful number of young Brazilians in attendance, a great inspiration for the future and the Brazil Vegetarian Society (only founded last year) is now well into planning it's own National Congress in Sao Paulo next year.

We'll have to wait and see if Florianopolis achieves the full 'Orono effect' for Latin America, but the indications are very promising (see the new IVU Members below). It is just possible that, in years to come, those of us privileged to be there will be able to look back at the time we witnessed one of those rare moments that changed the course of vegetarian history.

Even if you couldn't be there in person you can still share a virtual experience of the Congress - simply go to http://www.ivu.org/congress/2004 where you'll find:

- texts and photos of lectures
- recipes and photos from cookery demonstrations
- hundreds more photos of every aspect of the Congress including the stalls, the resort, dancing, food, people, wildlife, tours
- and the complete cruelty-free veg-fashion shows.

Lots more to come in the next few weeks.

WERE YOU THERE?

- if so we still need more of all the above, lecture texts, recipes, photos of everything.

And, if you attended any previous IVU World Vegetarian Congress we still need more from those too.

- or do you have old copies of your Society's magazines/newsletters with reports on IVU Congresses? If so we would like copies of those too - in any language.

This is all part of our archive of all Congresses since 1908 - the details of the Congresses in the early 1990s (pre mass-internet days) are particularly thin and many of you reading this must have attended some of them.

So do help by sending your old texts and photos to the IVU Webmaster, John Davis - webmaster@ivu.org - if you can't scan them please send photocopies, just ask for the postal address.

For everything we have so far see: http://www.ivu.org/history

Return to Top

=========================
3. Book Review/Reasons for Vegan Diets

Plant Roots: 101 Reasons Why the Human Diet is Rooted Exclusively in Plants
By Rex Bowlby
Reviewed by Dan Balogh www.vegsource.com/articles2/balogh_plant_roots.htm

To be honest, when I first starting flipping through this book I was skeptical. I wondered why we needed yet another book on the merits of veganism. I wondered whether the cheesy clip art at the beginning of each section would try my patience and inhibit my ability to get through all 500 pages. A web search on Rex Bowlby found one previous book by him -- dealing with how to keep kids entertained without spending loads of money. What does this guy know about veganism, I thought?

Gosh was I wrong! Now, after having read the book, and finding it quite easy to do so, I believe it is one of the most important contributions to vegan literature in some time. Yes, there are plenty of good books on veganism out there, as well as journal and magazine articles -- but the value that Bowlby adds with "Plant Roots" is very important. After climbing that mountain of existing information, and absorbing it all, he does an amazing job of isolating the most compelling facts and distilling them into bite-sized portions for us. One can think of "Plant Roots" as the Cliff Notes version of the vegan literature -- only this Cliff Notes is 500 pages long!

"Plant Roots" covers every possible angle from health to the environment, from animal rights to religion. The breadth of material covered is astonishing. The 101 "reasons" of the book’s subtitle actually refers to its 101 chapters, each of which offers dozens of reasons why veganism is our natural diet. To prove that he’s climbed the mountain, Bowlby lists loads of footnotes and rigorously traces them back to one or more of the 1,001 sources listed in the bibliography. When was the last time you saw a bibliography with 1,001 sources?

A 500-page Cliff Notes? That can’t be entertaining, can it? Think again. Bowlby jumps hoops to make the information as accessible and entertaining as possible, concocting fictional radio interviews, movie plots, games and other devices to keep the reader entertained. In most cases it works, at other times it distracts from the main points. Bowlby is at his best, however, when he’s being dead serious, formulating his unique insights into some very memorable analogies.

For example, Bowlby’s observation regarding the American obsession with eating chicken eggs (which is to chickens as the human placenta is to humans) is stark -- "Most likely after witnessing a human birth, and seeing the placenta expelled, our thoughts did not include the desire to cook up an omelet." Later on, when describing the deplorable conditions that broiler chickens are forced to endure during their mercifully short lives Bowlby notes, "Broilers will live their lives crammed four to five in a 16-by-18 inch cage. Imagine living our total life in an elevator with 20 other people." He continues "To reduce the damage, chickens’ beaks are partially removed. Imagine having our fingernails torn off."

At other times the book is very funny. In describing how we eat animals to get vitamins, instead of just directly eating the plants that the animals eat, Bowlby says, "This might be compared to chewing someone else’s already-chewed gum." Taking vitamin supplements to combat our lousy eating habits is like "pu tting out a three-alarm fire with a water pistol."

In the chapter on manipulation, Bowlby takes on the food pyramid. Defenders of the food pyramid, which is far from satisfactory, claim that it’s a good compromise between what is realistic and what is optimal -- after all, folks are going to eat eggs and bacon anyway, so they should be told to merely limit their intake. Bowlby ponders how this reasoning would work when it comes to parenting -- "We know our kids are going to run into traffic anyway, so we should advise them not to do so more than two or three times a week."

At other times Bowlby’s observations are simply brilliant. In the section on pork, after describing the many similarities between pigs and humans, and explaining how pig hearts are now being used as human transplants, he observes, "If the absurdity of replacing our heart, with the heart of the we consumed that ruined our heart isn’t evident, then we should fear for the future of our species."

As if his amazing distillation of the mountain of information into the first 400 pages wasn’t enough, Bowlby closes the book with a 32-page summary of what came before, listing nearly 300 facts and observations. In essence, he first reduces the mountain into chewable bites and then chews those bites for us in the last 32 pages. This alone is worth the price of the book.

So if you’re interested in learning more about veganism, you have a couple of choices. You can begin climbing the mountain yourself (reading all the existing books and articles), or you can read Rex Bowlby’s amazing trip report. Ironically, in this case it seems preferable to chew someone else’s already-chewed bubble gum!

Dan Balogh is a frequent contributor to VegSource.com and a member of EarthSave New York City. He works as a systems engineer in the telecommunications industry. He and his wife have been vegans for several years; their kitty Lulu happily approves.

Return to Top

=========================
4. Rabbi Menashe of Ilya (1767-1832) on Compassion for Animals
Translated by David Sears, author of "The Vision of Eden: Animal Welfare and Vegetarianism in Jewish Law and Mysticism

My heart is anxious within me concerning the bitterness and pain of animals in the world! Aside from the destruction that takes place in the world, that each creature swallows alive its weaker counterpart, most of the world's evils result from insufficient sustenance. The masses of humanity pursue their livelihood, but ever fail to reach it. Few are they, less than one in a thousand, whose livelihood is secure. Most of the world struggles to survive, lacking bread and afflicted by hunger and thirst. The naked go without clothing; there is no cover against the cold, and no home in which to dwell. In addition to this there are natural catastrophes and severe and chronic sicknesses, may God protect us.

Without a doubt, the justice of the Holy One, blessed be He, cannot be questioned; God did not create His world for vengeance and evil, heaven forbid. However, for all this my heart is aggrieved. Although God, may He be blessed, has been gracious unto me, and has always sustained me and protected me from oppression and starvation, nevertheless my heart has not been untroubled by need -- yet I am ashamed to feel sorry for my own troubles when I behold the great oppression and suffering in the world. I recognize in myself the greatness of God's kindness, how great is His goodness unto me. Yet my main suffering and grief has always been the affliction that my eyes have seen constantly around me in the world. My eyes pine away from this all the day.

I am powerless and lack any solution. Again and again I tell myself, "Perhaps I can find a solution, perhaps it may fall to my lot to bring merit and relief to the world!"

In most of the world, each person exerts himself only for the welfare of a few individuals, for himself and his household and his offspring. Even those who exert themselves with fear of Heaven in order to attain eternal life, their entire motivation is solely to benefit themselves and the lives of their progeny. (Rabbi Menashe of Ilya, a disciple of the Vilna Gaon, from Tikkun Klalli, Hakdamah, cited in Introduction to Alfei Menashe, Part II).

Return to Top

=========================
5. Update on NJ Model Nutrition Policy Proposal

Forwarded messages from Satya Dosapati

Our meeting with Senator Shirley Turner's office (chief of staff, Meredith) occurred as planned.Maureen Pfeffer represented NJ Parent Teacher Association. NJ Coalition made the slide show presentation that went into details of the causes, remedies, roadblocks, fiscal issues to address children health and how to complement NJ Model Nutrition policy. Maureen from NJ PTA presented the material from the Team Nutrition activity. Our input was very well received. We also provided a folder with all presentation materials.

We sought Senator's assistance to sponsor Senate version of A3196 and help us in getting to meet the Governor to express our concerns/issues to NJ Model Nutrition policy.Meredith will present the material to the senator and said she will provide us help to get to meet the Governor's office.If that materializes we hope to have different leaders to present our case to the Governor. Several assemblypersons have assured that they would be joining such a meeting with the Governor.

We are also setting up to meet with Assemblypersons Herbert Conaway and Morgan Stanley who are authors of A3196 before January 15th.

Remember, if we we don't take care of our children, who will. Please give this the priority it is due and come forward to become active. Different states are leading efforts in this and we can also do it in New Jersey.

Have a very happy holidays.

-----------------
Previous message:

Public hearing of NJ Model Nutrition Policy was held on Dec 1st as scheduled. There were about 30-40 of testimonials with almost 90% of testimonials coming from Food industry comprising of food vending machine operators,Coca Cola and other soft drink manufacturers, lobbyists, Food Services Directors etc.There were only about 4 or 5 testimonials representing the interests of health of children (2 of them from NJ Coalition).

It is disheartening to see in the midst of this epidemic, there is hardly anyone representing the children and their interests. DO WE WANT TO LEAVE WHAT OUR CHILDREN EATS TO FOOD INDUSTRY AND THEIR INTERESTS?

While the NJ Model nutrition policy is a step in right direction, it need to address some key issues to make a real difference. Its focus is mainly on removing food of minimal nutrition value and replacing the vending machine contents with 100% fruit drinks and milk. The issues are given below. Currently, we are planning to meet Senator Shirley Turner as well as Governor Codey to express our concerns/issues.

1) It does not address education of healthy eating habits. No matter what policies are made, proper education is key to success. Successful and proven programs such as Antonia Demas from Food Services Institute are key to make any real impact.

2) Overemphasis of milk. Given the multi-cultural nature of our state population, this policy is ignoring the fact that 90% of Asians, 75% of African Americans and 53% of Hispanics are lactose intolerant (while only 15% Caucasians are lactose intolerant).We believe unlimited 2% milk is also not the best solution(given that 2% is misleading because there is 5g saturated fat in 2% milk compared to 8gms saturated fat in whole milk).Also, while many tout milk as an ideal food, the jury is still out there with child specialists like Dr. Spock recommending that milk be completed stopped atvery young age and is increasingly said to be contributing to Asthma, allergies and ear infections.

3) Our suggestion to vending items is to take a balanced approach.We concur with the bill that recently passed in NJ State Assembly (A 3196, http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2004/Bills/A3500/3196_I1.htm).It states that:

>> Before school opens and during school hours, food items sold through a vending machine to a pupil at a public elementary or middle school shall be limited to the following:

(1) whole grain, enriched or fortified grains or grain products;

(2) fruits or 100% fruit juices;

(3) water;

(4) milk or dairy products;

(5) soy-based products;

(6) vegetables or vegetable juices;

(7) electrolyte-replacement beverages; or

(8) nuts, nut spreads, seeds, legumes or trail mixes.

4) This policy does not address enough about the school lunches. Every single health organizations as well as USDA is emphasizing that plant based foods are key for fighting diseases and children are consuming too little of these. While USDA has certain standards, they are lax and are based on weekly consumption. Children usually end up eating high fatty, fiberless food and throw away any other foods. We suggest the following:

>>Include one complete plant based protein option on all lunch items (including la carte items)

>>Do not permit any product that is not whole grain or at the least whole grain should be the primary ingredient.

5) There is growing number of vegetarians in New Jersey state who chose to be vegetarian or vegan for religious, ethnic or ethical reasons and these children are left out of school lunch system. It was suggested that this be handled by each school district. However, it is simply impractical to try to implement this in each school district given the very large number of school districts in each of the 20+ counties in the state. Adding to this is the fact that even where children from this population is few in number, there is a psychological issue when children feel they are left out of the system.

6) Should avoid Foods with minimal nutrition at all times and all days in school campus.

With best regards, Satya Dosapati NJ Coalition for healthy foods in schools

satyad@att.com

Return to Top

=========================
6. Important New Book on Global Threats

Forwarded message:

OUTGROWING THE EARTH: THE FOOD SECURITY CHALLENGE IN AN AGE OF FALLING WATER TABLES AND RISING TEMPERATURES
by Lester R. Brown (W.W. Norton and Co.)
http://www.earth-policy.org/Books/Out/Contents.htm

Preface from Outgrowing the Earth:

On hearing his political opponent described as a modest chap, Winston Churchill reputedly responded that "he has much to be modest about." Having just completed a book dealing with the increasingly complex issue of world food security, I too feel that I have a lot to be modest about.

Assessing the world food prospect was once rather straightforward, largely a matter of extrapolating, with minor adjustments, historically recent agricultural supply and demand trends. Now suddenly that is all changing. It is no longer just a matter of trends slowing or accelerating; in some cases they are reversing direction.

Grain harvests that were once rising everywhere are now falling in some countries. Fish catches that were once rising are now falling. Irrigated area, once expanding almost everywhere, is now shrinking in some key food-producing regions.

Beyond this, some of the measures that are used to expand food production today, such as overpumping aquifers, almost guarantee a decline in food production tomorrow when the aquifers are depleted and the wells go dry. The same can be said for overplowing and overgrazing. We have entered an era of discontinuity on the food front, an era where making reliable projections is ever more difficult.

New research shows that a 1 degree Celsius rise in temperature leads to a decline in wheat, rice, and corn yields of 10 percent. In a century where temperatures could rise by several degrees Celsius, harvests could be devastated.

Although climate change is widely discussed, we are slow to grasp its full meaning. Everyone knows the earth’s temperature is rising, but commodity analysts often condition their projections on weather returning to "normal," failing to realize that with climate now in flux, there is no normal to return to.

Falling water tables are also undermining food security. Water tables are now falling in countries that contain more than half the world’s people. While there is a broad realization that we are facing a future of water shortages, not everyone has connected the dots to see that a future of water shortages will be a future of food shortages.

Perhaps the biggest agricultural reversal in recent times has been the precipitous decline in China’s grain production since 1998. Ten years ago, in Who Will Feed China?, I projected that China’s grain production would soon peak and begin to decline. But I did not anticipate that it would drop by 50 million tons between 1998 and 2004. Since 1998 China has covered this decline by drawing down its once massive stocks of grain. Now stocks are largely depleted and China is turning to the world market. Its purchase of 8 million tons of wheat to import in 2004 could signal the beginning of a shift from a world food economy dominated by surpluses to one dominated by scarcity.

Overnight, China has become the world’s largest wheat importer. Yet it will almost certainly import even more wheat in the future, not to mention vast quantities of rice and corn. It is this potential need to import 30, 40, or 50 million tons of grain a year within the next year or two and the associated emergence of a politics of food scarcity that is likely to put food security on the front page of newspapers.

SNIP

Beyond the Earth’s Limits" (online now in Adobe format). http://www.earth-policy.org/Books/Out/Contents.htm

To order a copy, please call 202.496.9290 x 13.

Earth Policy Institute
1350 Connecticut Ave., NW, Ste 403
Washington, DC 20036
T: (202) 496.9290
F: (202) 496.9325

Return to Top

=========================
7. Environmental Impacts of Factory Farms

Down on the Filthy Farm
by Jim Motavalli
E Magazine
http://www.emagazine.com/view/?2152

An investigative report in Cleveland’s Plain Dealer November 27 makes it plain why large corporate animal farms are terrible neighbors-and why communities that welcomed them in often regret their decision.

o Economic benefits illusory. In rural Paulding County, the 125,000 turkeys, 3,700 cows and 13,000 hogs far outnumber the 20,000 residents. And they don’t pay their way. Only 25 percent of the money from the county’s large dairies reaches the schools. A whopping 75 percent goes to road maintenance (not even covering the extensive damage done by transported cows). But Ohio Department of Agriculture Director Fred Dailey welcomes the big operators. "In Ohio, they’re all family farms," he says. And all farms "are beneficial to us, if they operate in a manner that doesn’t cause environmental problems." Oh, but they do cause environmental problems, say activists and, increasingly, public health officials.

o No local windfalls. Only about one percent of the grain used in the Paulding County dairies is bought locally, according to an Ohio State study. Few local residents work in the megafarms, because the pay at $7.50 an hour is too low. Instead, most of the jobs are filled with Mexican migrant workers.

o Mountains of manure. The biggest problem for local residents is the open lagoons of liquefied manure, which are frequently mismanaged. Three dairies in Paulding County have violated the Clean Water Act, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. For longtime residents like Bob and Diane Thornell, the coming of corporate hog farms means exile from their own 40-acre farm. Both have been diagnosed with brain damage. Ron and Vicki Kadesch were forced to abandon the 80-acre farm they’d lived on for 16 years after a 680-cow dairy farm (complete with manure storage lagoon) moved in nearby.

According to Farm Sanctuary, huge hog farms are the biggest problem. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) says that large farms now dominate the hog industry, with operations housing over 5,000 animals accounting for nearly three-quarters of U.S. pig production. "In 1994," reports Farm Sanctuary from USDA figures, "73 percent of pigs raised in the U.S. were on small farms, and 27 percent were on large farms. In 2001, those numbers were switched, with 73 percent of pigs raised on large farms and 27 percent on small farms." As the farms get bigger, they turn increasingly to intensive confinement systems, which crowd animals tightly together.

And the giant farms are a disaster all around. The Humane Society of the U.S. (HSUS) reports, "The livestock industry’s claim that a productive animal is, by nature, a healthy one is extremely deceptive. The reality is that drugs, hormones, and other chemicals are routinely administered to animals in intensive confinement systems to mask stress and disease and to speed growth. In addition, farm animals have been selectively bred for productivity at the expense of their well-being, and they quickly become worn out. Hundreds of thousands of these animals die every day. Physical disorders brought on by exhaustive production demands are common.

"What’s more," HSUS adds, "dust and toxic gases accumulate in crowded, enclosed systems, causing respiratory diseases and death. Agricultural animal disease annually costs $17 billion in the U.S. Such huge losses are considered acceptable because factory farm profits depend on overall output and the optimal use of space and equipment-not on the well-being of individual animals."

The large farms are a growing human health concern. The New York Times reports, "A growing number of scientists and public health officials around the country say they have traced a variety of health problems faced by neighbors of huge industrial farms to vast amounts of concentrated animal waste, which emit toxic gases while collecting in open-air cesspools or evaporating through sprays. The gases, hydrogen sulfide and ammonia, are poisonous. Livestock trade officials and Bush administration regulators say more study is needed before any cause and effect can be proved. But Dr. Kaye H. Kilburn, a professor at the University of Southern California who studies the effects of toxic chemicals on the brain, said evidence strongly supported a link between the farms and the illnesses."

Hog farms have their defenders, of course, including the Heartland and Hudson Institutes. Dennis and Alex Avery of the latter claim that corporate hog farms have not damaged North Carolina’s waterways. "Between 1985 and 1995, they report, "the hog population in [two North Carolina counties] increased tenfold, from 500,000 to 5.5 million animals. By 1997, this area accounted for 10 percent of the total U.S. swine inventory."

The Raleigh News & Observer ran a Pulitzer Prize-winning five-article series in 1995 titled, "Boss Hog: North Carolina’s Pork Revolution," which raised concern about the "9.5 million tons" of hog waste coming from the "megalopolis of seven million animals that live in metal confinement barns" in eastern North Carolina. But the two Averys, citing Duke University studies, say that "there is still no evidence whatsoever that water quality has gotten worse in North Carolina." By suppressing the results of these studies, they charge, "the government of North Carolina effectively stole the great economic opportunity of hog farm expansion from some of its poorest citizens."

But South Dakota’s Rosebud Sioux have also realized that the revenue from corporate hog farms isn’t worth the pollution that comes with it. According to a report in Agribusiness Examiner, the Sioux were triumphant last year after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to get involved with the tribe’s rejection of what would have been the third-largest hog farm in the world, sucking up 1.7 million gallons of water from the Ogalalla Aquifer daily. What’s more, an appeals panel determined that Bell Farms was without legal standing to continue operation on the reservation, meaning that 48,000 hogs and their waste were to be moved off the reservation. Native American activist Winona LaDuke calls this "the first such industrial plant closure in history." But it probably won’t be the last.

Return to Top

=========================
8. Vegan Courses at the Tree of Life Institute

Forwarded message from the Tree of Life Institute

Conscious Eating Intensive Learn to Prepare Delicious Creative Live-Food Vegan Meals! February 13th-20th 2005

Bring Pleasure and Health to Family, Friends, and Yourself with Joy and Ease!

Experienced and dedicated chefs instruct and guide you with the latest and most loved recipes, based on the concepts in the book, "Rainbow Green Live-Food Cuisine," by Rebbe Gabriel Cousens M.D., M.D.(H), and the Tree of Life Cafe Chefs

The foundation of the cuisine at the Tree of Life Cafe is food that supports spiritual life. Conscious Eating begins with Conscious Food preparation. The living water contained in food has a memory, a crystal structure that retains our state of presence and the environment in which we are working while preparing the foods. Science has also shown that we influence the smallest particles known, so we can create food that has a deep healing vibration on all levels of creation. At the Tree of Life cafe we teach people that if they leave wi th one skill, that would be, to remain present and in your heart while preparing vegan live foods; in that you have the essence of conscious food preparation.

Course Includes
*·Workbook of your training week
*·Hands On Training (3 hours/ day) - You make the meals!
*·Demonstrations (1 hour/ day) - Watch the experts
*·Expert Guidance and Support
*·Access to the Best Resources, Food, and Equipment
*·Three all vegan organic live food meals each day
*·Covers basic and advanced skills
*·Basic Live Food Chef Certificate

Four group sessions with Gabriel Cousens:
*·Live Foods & Rainbow Green Live Food Cuisine
*·How to Individualize your Diet
*·Two Questions and Answer sessions

Daily Kali Ray Tri Yoga with Shanti GoldsCousens Every morning connect with the beautiful flows of Tri Yoga. Loosen up the body and awaken the spirit. Course Reservations: 520 394 2520, ext 201/206, reservations@treeoflife.nu

Basic Program Details: Special Introductory Rate (last time at this price): $1,395 (will rise to $1700 at the next program). Includes 7 nights lodging, meals, nutrition and food prep classes, yoga classes, and evening programs with Gabriel Cousens, MD, MD (H), Diplomat in Ayurveda which include meditation, spiritual Q&A, chanting, mikveh, Smicha L'Shefa, Shamanic Kabbalat Shabbat, and Havdallah.

Return to Top

=========================
9. Article on Jewish teachings on Compassion to Animals

The Journey to Unity - 72 The Divine Tzedekah to All Creatures
By Yosef Ben Shlomo Hakohen, JVNA advisor and author

On Friday evening, before saying the Sabbath "Kiddush" - blessing of sanctification, we chant the following words: "The heaven and the earth and all their host were brought to their destined completion" (Genesis 2:1). One of the classical commentators, the Ramban, explains that the "host" of creation includes all creatures and plant life on earth. The Hebrew word for "host" is tzava - a group assembled and united for a common purpose. The Midrash on our verse therefore explains that the word tzava is conveying to us the following message: All forms of life serve the unifying Divine purpose, even those creatures that a human being may feel are not needed, such as "flies, fleas, and mosquitoes" (Genesis Rabbah).

Dear Friends,

If all forms of life serve the unifying Divine purpose, then we can understand why the Divine plan entitles each creature to receive what it needs in order to fulfill its purpose within creation. As Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch writes in his commentary on the Torah (Genesis 15:8), this Divine plan is called "tzedek" - one of the biblical terms for justice; moreover, the deeds which fulfill this plan are called "tzedakah" - loving and nurturing deeds which are done with an awareness that the recepients are entitled by the Creator to receive what they need.

In fact, the Creator of all life does tzedekah, and our sages describe the Creator's nurturing of all life in the following manner:

"He does tzedekah and nourishes, supports, and sustains all who come into the world and all that He created." (Tanna Devei Eliyahu 17:8)

Since human beings are created in the Divine Image, they have the capacity to emulate the benevolent tzedekah of the Compassionate One; in fact, there is a mitzvah - Divine mandate - to "go in His ways" (Deuteronomy 28:9). And in order "to go in His ways," we need to remember that the Divine benevolence is extended to all, as it is written: "The Compassionate One is good to all, and His compassion is on all His works" (Psalm 145:9).

If we have a general mitzvah to emulate the benevolent ways of the Compassionate One, including the Divine tzedekah to all life, then why were we given a specific mitzvah to give tzedekah to human beings? The Midrash cites a story which can provide us with the beginning of an answer. In this story, the Midrash cites a dialogue between Avraham, our father, and his ancestor, Shem, the son of Noah - who was also known as "Malki-Tzedek":

Malki -Tzedek and his family were in the ark during the great flood, and Avraham asked Malki-Tzedek: "By what merit were you able to leave the ark and begin a new life?"

Malki-Tzedek responded: "Through the merit of acts of tzedakah that we performed in the ark."

Avraham then asked" "To whom did you give tzedakah? There were no poor people in the ark; there was only you and your family."

Malki-Tzedek replied: "All night, we were busy feeding the livestock, wild creatures, and birds; in fact, we were too busy to sleep!"

Avraham said to himself: "If they were able to leave the ark because of the tzedakah which they gave to livestock, wild creatures, and birds, then how much more would I accomplish if I performed acts of tzedakah for human beings who are created in the Divine image!" He then opened an inn for needy travelers (Genesis 21:33), and he provided them with food, drink, and escort. (Yalkut Shimoni on Psalm 37)

Avraham realized that the greatest service he could do for the entire world is to nurture human beings, who are created in the Divine image. For he understood that human beings have the unique potential to emulate the universal Divine nurturing. It is for this reason that the Creator gave humankind the sacred task "to serve and to protect" the earth (Genesis 2:15). Given the unique potential and role of humankind, we were given a specific mitzvah to give tzedekah to human beings.

In fact, even before the Torah was given, Avraham stressed this mitzvah, as the Compassionate One said about Avraham:

"For I have loved him because he commands his children and his household after him to keep the way of the Compassionate One to do tzedakah and justice" (Genesis 18:19).

Shalom,

Yosef Ben Shlomo Hakohen (See below)

Related Teachings and Stories:

1. "Tzedek" is the Divine plan that entitles each creature to receive what it needs in order to fulfill its purpose within creation. A person who strives to live according to the Torah's principle of tzedek in all areas of his existence is called a "tzadik." In this spirit, King Solomon wrote, "A tzadik knows the needs of his animal's soul" (Proverbs 12:10). The Malbin, a noted 19th century biblical commentator, explains that the tzadik understands the nature of his animal, and he gives the animal its food in its proper time and according to the amount it needs. He also makes sure to fulfill the Torah's mitzvah to feed one's animal before one feeds oneself. For the tzadik, writes the Malbim, lives according to the following code:

"The tzadik acts according to the laws of tzedek; not only does he act according to these laws with human beings, but also with his own animal."

2. Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch and his family lived in Germany, which had cold, snowy winters. Rabbi Hirsch's wife would put food on her window sill every morning for the sparrows who gathered there. After her passing, Rabbi Hirsch continued this practice until his last days. When he was on his final sickbed, he told his sons not to forget to take care of the birds. (This story is found in the ArtScroll biography, "Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch" by Rabbi Eliyahu Meir Klugman: For further information on this inspiring biography, visit: www.artscroll.com.)

3. The poor Jews who lived in the villages of Eastern Europe often supplemented their meager income by having some chickens and even a cow or a goat in their yard. The accomplished Talmud scholar, Rabbi Isaac Rosensweig, was one of these poor Jews who tried to make a living by raising chickens. After the German army invaded his village in World War 2, Rabbi Isaac was deported to the death camps. The German soldiers laughed when he cried out beseechingly from the window of the death train, "Go to my house and give the chickens food and water, for they have not touched food and water for a whole day!" (A longer version of this story appears in, "The Vision of Eden - Animal Welfare and Vegetarianism in Jewish Law and Mysticism" by David Sears, Orot: www.orot.com.)

4. Despite his aura of reverence for God, Rabbi Eliyahu Lopian (1876-1970), a noted teacher of Mussar (Torah ethics), always exuded gentleness and love, not only to human beings who are created in the Divine image, but to animals as well. Once he noticed a lost kitten that had taken refuge in the yeshiva (Torah academy) of Kfar Chassidim, a village in Northern Israel. Immediately, he became this kitten's patron and concerned himself with all its needs. This elderly sage placed a saucer of milk before the purring kitten every morning, and with pleasure, he watched it take each sip from the milk. (Ibid)

Hazon - Our Universal Vision: www.shemayisrael.co.il/publicat/hazon/

Return to Top

=========================
10. A Little Humor

CONCERNED ABOUT TOO MANY CARBS IN YOUR DIET?

For those of you who watch what you eat, here's the final word on nutrition and health. It's a relief to know the truth after all those conflicting medical studies.

1. The Japanese eat very little fat and suffer fewer heart attacks than Americans.

2. The Mexicans eat a lot of fat and suffer fewer heart attacks than Americans.

3. The Chinese drink very little red wine and suffer fewer heart attacks than Americans.

4. The Italians drink much red wine and suffer fewer heart attacks than Americans.

5. The Germans drink a lot of beers and eat lots of sausages and fats and suffer fewer heart attacks than Americans.

CONCLUSION: Eat and drink what you like. Speaking English is apparently what kills you!

"The human appetite for animal flesh is a driving force behind virtually every major category of environmental damage now threatening the human future---deforestation, erosion, fresh water scarcity, air and water pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, social injustice, the destabilization of communities, and the spread of disease." Editors, World Watch, July/August 2004

Never doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world, indeed it is the only thing that ever has. --Margaret Mead

Return to Top

=========================
** Fair Use Notice** This document may contain copyrighted material, use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners.I believe that this not-for-profit, educational use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law). If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.